April 10th, 2015
Update 4/11/15: According to a little birdie who spoke with Gary Iyles at the BrightonSEO conference, Gary “guaranteed” pack rankings won’t be affected. Guess we shall see…
Google’s pending Mobile-Friendly algo update has become the Apple Watch of SEO – I can’t look at my Twitter feed without a blur of “How to get ready for Mobilegeddon” posts streaming by, so I might as well jump on in. Jennifer Slegg over at the SEMPost reports that Gary Iyles, a Google Webmaster Trends Analyst, said at the Brighton SEO conference that Google’s Mobile Friendly Ranking Signal Will Not Affect Local Pack Listings: According to Illyes, if a local business is appearing in the Google Pack results, but does not have a mobile friendly site, their listing in the Pack results will NOT be impacted. Those Google My Business listings will remain. Now I have no clue how this mobile update will affect anything and I am generally wary of Google’s ability to know how an update will affect anything, particularly Local rankings, until it actually pushes the button and releases the Kraken. But Iyles’ statement strikes me as potentially a very Googley version of Truthiness. Here’s my tin-foil hat translation:
- The Local Pack algorithm will not be changed. We are not touching it. Any time we touch that thing, all hell breaks loose.
- Your GMB “listing” will not be impacted! It’s mobile-friendly after all. Pay no attention to the fact that I didn’t say anything about your GMB listing’s rankings in the Google Pack results. Those Google My Business listings will remain in our index – all your GMB dupes will too.
- Don’t worry about the fact that 2014’s Pigeon update supposedly increased the influence of “Web Ranking Signals” on the Local Pack algorithm and that we said “we will be expanding our use of mobile-friendliness as a ranking signal”.
- Even though we may be changing our “Web Ranking” algorithm, as I said, we are not touching the Local Pack algorithm. It’s still going to rely on “Web Ranking Signals” in the same way it has since Pigeon came out.
Update 4/11: Dr. Pete had the following interesting observation:
& Gary Ilyes, Jennifer & I had a clarifying conversation on Twitter (note Storify could not capture all of the tweets. You can follow the whole conversation here.)
Tags: Google · Local Search · Mobile Search
Posted by Andrew Shotland
March 16th, 2015
Today Google published “An update on doorway pages”. The post implies that Google will soon be updating its algorithm to weed out offending doorway pages from the SERPs:
Sites with large and well-established doorway campaigns might see a broad impact from this change.
While sites with spammy set ups such as multiple exact match domains that link to the same landing page are likely the targets (get ready for more Lawyer leads SEOs!), Google’s well-intended algorithm updates often go too far so brace yourselves for collateral damage, even if you think you have a good set up. Some potential issues:
- Local directory sites with geo-SERPs that have the same content. For example, when one gas station serves two rural towns a site will have two pages – Gas Stations in City A & Gas Stations in City B – that have substantially the same content and lead to the same gas station profile. If these get hit, these sites will likely have to choose to only display results that are actually in the searched geo, which could have huge implications as to how data is displayed across the entire site.
- Service area pages that don’t have unique content. We have long seen issues with sites that use cookie cutter text to create multiple service area pages. While plenty of sites still get by with it, I imagine this algorithm could finally snuff out this tactic. Get your content writers ready.
- Franchise businesses – they have all of these issues in spades – particularly those who have microsites for every location. While cookie-cutter implementations make sense to easily create a lot of local sites, it’s possible Google will throw these local babies out with the bathwater.
I don’t want to be too alarmist. This update may be no big deal, but when I see Google use the phrase “broad impact”, I tend to get a bit paranoid.
And then there’s this:
For example, searchers might get a list of results that all go to the same site. So if a user clicks on one result, doesn’t like it, and then tries the next result in the search results page and is taken to that same site that they didn’t like, that’s a really frustrating experience.
Might be a good time to short Yelp:
Posted by Andrew Shotland
March 6th, 2015
At the beginning of every new engagement we ask clients for access to their Google Analytics, Google Webmaster Tools, Adwords data, Bing Webmaster Tools and any other analytics they have. 95% of the time, the client does not have Bing Webmaster Tools set up and 50% of the time they don’t want to go through the (very minor) hassle of setting it up. Most clients are pretty focused on Google of course, but in some cases Bing can still drive significant traffic. And ignoring Bing because it’s not Google can be a big mistake. Case in point:
On January 15th of this year a large news site client’s Bing referrals dropped by about 150,000 – 200,000 sessions/day. So they were losing about 6 million visits per month. That’s not chump change. We did all of the standard technical SEO diagnoses and the site was clean. Google traffic looked fine. So we were pretty sure the problem was not on our end. The only thing I could do was email Bing’s webmaster support which I fully expected to be a black hole. I got a canned “thanks for the submission” response and pretty much forgot about it. But you’ll be amazed at what happened next!:
click to enlarge
I ran into Duane Forrester, Bing’s Webmaster relations guy, at SMX West this week and asked him what the standard procedure was for sites that get whacked by Bing. He claimed that the Bing Webmaster Tools team takes these support inquiries seriously and the key is to be credible and patient. He stressed that you should not have multiple people submitting support tickets for the same site and described this partly as a resource issue – as in they can only spend so much time on any one site/ticket – and partly as a credibility issue – you should be confident that you have ruled out issues on your side and having ten people pile on complaints to Bing support isn’t going to make them move any faster. Of course the flip side is that asking site owners to be patient while Bing keeps you in the dark and figures out if they screwed something up is a pretty big ask. But there aren’t many other options.
The good news for this particular client is that it appears that the issue was on Bing’s side and they responded to our request. So set up your Bing Webmaster Tools. You’ll never know when you’ll need it.
Posted by Andrew Shotland
February 26th, 2015
Google recently rolled out their “primary category” requirement to Google My Business Locations bulk accounts. Instead of associating the first category per location in a bulk account as the “primary category”, the roll out is instead selecting nothing as a primary category for all locations in a bulk account.
This means that if you want to receive the benefit of having an associated “primary category” you need to go into your bulk accounts and chose the primary category for all locations. Since Google has been placing more importance on categories in their recent Google My Business guidelines updates, these may be a non-trivial ranking factor. So those of you with large, multi-location clients now know what you are doing for the rest of the day.
Tags: Google My Business
Posted by Dan Leibson
February 5th, 2015
We have been seeing a lot of mismatched locations in the local packs lately but this one takes the cake, er curry…:
(Click to enlarge)
You know you can’t beat Nayana Eye Care in Pradesh. They’re “recognized by the Food Corporation of India” and have “world-class sterility.”
Tags: Google Maps · Google Place Pages · Google+ Local
Posted by Andrew Shotland